![]() ![]() The incision of editing ability and social media connectivity is brilliant. The Q2 is fantastic, but it sure would be nice to own something that is radically forward-thinking, like this new Zeiss. I'm hoping there is a compelling replacement soon. Just sold my Q after 2+ years of heavy use. Let me know your thoughts in the comments. Leica and Zeiss might not be good comparisons, but if Sony can muster a photographic folly that makes us feel happy despite the fact that we may never consider buying it, perhaps Canon and Nikon should give it a go too.Īt a time when the battle for the mirrorless market is ever-more intense, I’m probably being unrealistic. Company affiliation is built not simply on lens choices and the number of autofocus points, but also on how people perceive a company’s soul. It’s about me wanting camera manufacturers to step outside of their comfort zones and breathe some innovation into their brands. So fundamentally, this isn’t simply about me wanting an expensive toy. This will never be a camera that sells by contrast, this is about creating an audacious product that makes the company as a whole feel as though it offers something special. Obviously, with the proliferation of smartphones, there’s no demand for such a camera today but the styling and history offers Canon plenty of ideas for a means of elevating its staid and conservative branding. The Canon Canonet arrived in 1961 and made the perfect pocket camera, its rangefinder technology blending ease of use with practicality alongside a couple of other progressive features. This type of camera is never going to be a money spinner but does make for some funky technology and refreshing experimentation.Ī Canonet GIII QL-17 from the early 1980s. For example, build a leaf shutter, remove the removable storage, and install Lightroom: Zeiss is still cagey about when the ZX1 will reach the shelves and the price is truly anyone’s guess, though we can be certain that it won't be cheap. The fixed prime body is where you send the dev guys with the biggest beards and the reddest eyes to dream, play, and come up with absurd ideas that somehow make it to market. The margins and sales numbers for this type of camera are both tiny which goes a long way to explaining why other manufacturers aren’t falling over themselves to produce something similar. However, as Fstoppers' own Ryan Mense mentioned back in 2015, this is an unfeasibly small camera given its innards, and Nikon and Canon have had almost four years to try and catch up. If that sounds a little ridiculous, no, I can’t imagine that they’ve sold by the bucket-load either. Again, this is not a cheap offering but for discrete wedding work and moments where you need to be less intrusive, it offers a solid choice for anyone with a spare $3,298. ![]() ![]() Of a similar ilk is the RX1R II, bringing in-lens leaf shutter technology to Sony’s selection of full-frame cameras. Stealth mode comes at a premium these days. Hardcore enthusiasts wait with bated breath to find out if Leica will release an identical camera without the red logo on the front at the cost of an extra $500. 47.3 megapixels means that its 28mm lens can be optically cropped to 35mm and 50mm with the push of a button or two, while still achieving reasonable image quality. German engineering, precision manufacturing, incredible lens sharpness and its magnesium-alloy body ensures that Leica remains a choice for hardened fans and the mid-life crisis, as well as being the millionaire's point-and-shoot. Leica makes a couple, with the Q2 its most recent offering and commanding the rather tasty price tag of $4,995, assuming you can get your hands on one. Cameras with fixed prime lenses are few and far between. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |